Are the Assioma Favero Power Meter Pedals a Reliable Tool for Monitoring Cycling Power Output?

This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the recently developed Assioma Favero pedals under laboratory cycling conditions. In total, 12 well-trained male cyclists and triathletes (VO = 65.7 ± 8.7 mL·kg·min) completed five cycling tests including graded exercises tests (GXT) at different cadences (70-100 revolutions per minute, rpm), workloads (100-650 Watts, W), pedaling positions (seated and standing), vibration stress (20-40 Hz), and an 8-s maximal sprint. Tests were completed using a calibrated direct drive indoor trainer for the standing, seated, and vibration GXTs, and a friction belt cycle ergometer for the high-workload step protocol. Power output (PO) and cadence were collected from three different brand, new pedal units against the gold-standard SRM crankset. The three units of the Assioma Favero exhibited very high within-test reliability and an extremely high agreement between 100 and 250 W, compared to the gold standard (Standard Error of Measurement, SEM from 2.3-6.4 W). Greater PO produced a significant underestimating trend ( < 0.05, Effect size, ES ≥ 0.22), with pedals showing systematically lower PO than SRM (1-3%) but producing low bias for all GXT tests and conditions (1.5-7.4 W). Furthermore, vibrations ≥ 30 Hz significantly increased the differences up to 4% ( < 0.05, ES ≥ 0.24), whereas peak and mean PO differed importantly between devices during the sprints ( < 0.03, ES ≥ 0.39). These results demonstrate that the Assioma Favero power meter pedals provide trustworthy PO readings from 100 to 650 W, in either seated or standing positions, with vibrations between 20 and 40 Hz at cadences of 70, 85, and 100 rpm, or even at a free chosen cadence.