AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the sensitivity and patient preference for self-collected saliva (SS) and anterior nasal specimens (ANS) versus traditional nasopharyngeal specimens (NPS) for detecting SARS-CoV-2 during testing events in Denver.
  • Results indicate that self-collected saliva specimens showed slightly higher sensitivity (85%) than anterior nasal specimens (80%), especially among symptomatic participants.
  • Overall, both self-collected methods were preferred by patients, suggesting they could be practical alternatives for SARS-CoV-2 testing, particularly for those showing symptoms.

Article Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal specimens (NPS) are commonly used for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing but can be uncomfortable for patients. Self-collected saliva specimens (SS) or anterior nasal specimens (ANS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection are less invasive, but the sensitivity of these specimen types has not been thoroughly evaluated.

Methods: During September-November 2020, 730 adults undergoing SARS-CoV-2 testing at community testing events and homeless shelters in Denver provided self-collected SS and ANS before NPS collection and answered a short survey about symptoms and specimen preference. Specimens were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by means of real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR); viral culture was performed on a subset of specimens positive by rRT-PCR. The sensitivity of SS and ANS for SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR was measured against that of NPS. Subgroup analyses included test outcomes by symptom status and culture results.

Results: Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR appeared higher for SS than for ANS (85% vs 80%) and higher among symptomatic participants than among those without symptoms (94% vs 29% for SS; 87% vs 50% for ANS). Among participants with culture-positive SARS-CoV-2 by any specimen type, the sensitivities of SS and ANS by rRT-PCR were 94% and 100%, respectively. SS and ANS were equally preferred by participants; most would undergo NPS collection again despite this method's being the least preferred.

Conclusions: SS were slightly more sensitive than ANS for SARS-CoV-2 detection with rRT-PCR. With both SS and ANS, SARS-CoV-2 was reliably detected among participants with symptoms. Self-collected SS and ANS offer practical advantages, are preferred by patients, and might be most useful for testing people with coronavirus disease 2019 symptoms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8135412PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab330DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ans sars-cov-2
16
sars-cov-2 detection
16
detection rrt-pcr
12
ans
10
sars-cov-2
9
severe acute
8
acute respiratory
8
respiratory syndrome
8
syndrome coronavirus
8
self-collected saliva
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!