Objectives: Debriefing is an essential component of simulation-based education. In-person, facilitator-led debriefing may not always be practical for newer forms of simulation, such as individual virtual simulations. Self-debriefing addresses the issue of practicality, but evidence of implementation and design are unknown. The aims of this review were to explore the use and design of self-debriefing in healthcare simulation and to identify to what extent self-debriefing found in the literature align with the INACSL Standards of Best Practice for debriefing.
Design: Integrative review.
Data Sources: Peer-reviewed studies indexed within CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, ERIC, Education Full Text (H.W. Wilson), Education Source, and Academic Search Premier databases.
Review Methods: A comprehensive database search was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The INACSL Standard of Best Practice: Simulation Debriefing was used as a framework for analysis. Ten articles were appraised and analyzed for this review.
Results: Alignment to best practice standards and presence of required criteria varied in self-debriefing designs. Self-debriefs used with graduate-level learners and self-debriefs with higher alignment to standards showed equivalent performance gains when compared to instructor-led debriefs. None of the studies measured reflection capacity despite it being a recommendation.
Conclusion: Findings indicate that well-designed self-debriefing provides equivalent outcomes to instructor-led debriefing. Best practice recommendations, such as promoting reflection, are underexplored in self-debriefing research.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104907 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!