Introduction: The Basic Health Care Policy (BHC), the Maghrebian version of WHO's Primary Health Care, is celebrating forty years in Tunisia. The aim of this paper was to contribute to the evaluation of BHCs in Tunisia, by listening to the testimonies of experts / leaders who have led their journey during these four decades.

Methods: The experts / leaders included in this testimony were invited via email and throu gh the use of the Delphi technique to report the acquired lessons and the errors. The collected qualitative data was analyzed through a process of categorization which classified them into: assets (strengths and opportunities) and handicaps (weaknesses and threats).

Results: Four experts / leaders took part in this call for testimonies, including two consultants to international organizations, a trade union doctor and a professor of Preventive Medicine. The main assets of the BHC in Tunisia, according to the participants, were: 1. The medical leadership initiated from the student phase;  2. The political commitment of public authorities ; 3. The academic support from the medical faculties and their Preventive Medicine departments ; 4. The institutionalization of the organizational framework of the Health Unit ; 5. The Academic training of professionals in integrated medicine. As for the handicaps of BHC in Tunisia, the experts / leaders particularly mentioned: 1. The weakness of community participation ; 2. The international attractiveness of accompanying national doctors; 3. The pressures of academic career imperatives ; 4. The lack of a National School of Public Health; 5. The context of privatization and hospital-centrism.

Conclusion: This feedback from the experts / leaders concerning BHC policies in Tunisia highlighted the perception of its performance "in tune" with WHO and "three years before Alma Ata". The new generation of BHC leaders have an obligation to safeguard their principles and adapt their practices to population expectations and new managerial approaches.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8711109PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

experts leaders
20
health care
12
primary health
8
care policy
8
preventive medicine
8
bhc tunisia
8
tunisia
6
leaders
6
health
5
bhc
5

Similar Publications

To validate Palestine's previously derived emergency department quality standards (EDQS) using an e-Delphi survey. A two-round e-Delphi survey validated the EDQS, developed in an earlier study through a literature review and consensus-building among Palestinian emergency medicine and healthcare quality experts. The study purposively sampled 53 emergency department and healthcare quality experts with over 5 years of experience.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The scope and standards of professional nursing practice define and guide high-quality nursing care. This article describes the collaboration between the International Home Care Nurses Organization and the American Nurses Association to develop evidence-based scope and standards of practice relevant to home-based nursing around the world.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The global burden of uncorrected refractive error demands for adoption of different approaches inclined towards scaling effective refractive error coverage. While innovative approaches such as utilization of telemedicine is being adopted by social enterprises in different parts of the world to scale refractive error service delivery, commercial entrepreneurship still dominates the optical industry in Kenya with minimal focus on accessibility and affordability. However, to achieve effective refractive error coverage across the economic pyramid, integration of enterprises inclined towards fulfilling a social mission through innovative approaches such as telemedicine is desirable.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Context: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) disproportionately impacts lower socioeconomic groups and is associated with many symptoms and complex decisions. Integration of Kidney Supportive Care (KSC) with CKD care can address these needs. To our knowledge, this approach has not been described in an underserved population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The Wound Care Collaborative Community (WCCC) assesses shortcomings and unmet needs in wound care by partnering with key stakeholders, such as the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), industry leaders, and expert health care providers and researchers, to advance the study of wound healing. Through this work, the WCCC has identified a few key barriers to innovation in wound care. The WCCC aims to accelerate the development of science-based, patient-centered solutions and address public policy challenges related to ensuring patients receive early access to innovative treatment options.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!