Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We aimed to validate the cosmetic utility of addition of nipple-areola recentralization (NAR) to rotation flap according to nipple tumor distance (NTD) as a volume displacement technique after breast conserving surgery (BCS) for lower-outer and upper-inner breast cancers. Twenty breast cancer patients who had been treated with rotation flap with (Group 1; n = 6) or without (Group 2; n = 14) NAR after BCS for lower-outer or upper-inner located tumors, and those who had undergone BCS without oncoplastic surgical technique for tumors in the same area (Control group; n = 43), were retrospectively investigated. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated using Harvard scale and/or BCCT.core. As a result, the ratio of patients categorized as excellent/good was 83% in Group 1 and 93% in Group 2, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P = 0.521). In addition, Group 1 + 2 showed a significantly higher ratio of patients classified as excellent/good than the control group (90% vs. 56%; P = 0.009). After adjustment of clinical background parameters using propensity score matching analysis between Group 1 + 2 and the control group, 12 pairs with similar background factors were matched. Among them, Group 1 + 2 showed a higher ratio of patients categorized as excellent/good than the control group (92% vs. 42%; P = 0.034). In conclusion, addition of NAR to rotation technique according to NTD may enable us to perform a volume displacement after BCS for lower-outer or upper-inner located tumors irrespective of NTD without sacrificing postoperative breast appearance.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.051 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!