Safety of administering cefazolin versus other antibiotics in penicillin-allergic patients for surgical prophylaxis at a major Canadian teaching hospital.

Surgery

ASPIRES (Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme), Medicine Quality and Safety, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver Coastal Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada; Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: September 2021

Background: Cefazolin surgical prophylaxis is associated with better patient outcomes; however, its use in penicillin-allergic patients is controversial. We evaluated the safety of cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic patients, including those with anaphylaxis histories.

Methods: We conducted a pre and postintervention quality improvement evaluation of an institution-wide policy change at a tertiary-care hospital, before (October 2017-January 2018), during (February 2018-September 2018), and after (October 2018-October 2019) transition to routine cefazolin prophylaxis for penicillin-allergic patients, including those with anaphylaxis histories but excluding severe delayed reactions (eg, Stevens-Johnson syndrome). Retrospective data was collected on all surgical prophylaxis patients with penicillin-anaphylactic histories between October 2017 and September 2018. From October 2018, we prospectively reviewed adverse events with cefazolin. Primary outcome was adverse events in penicillin-allergic patients receiving cefazolin perioperatively.

Results: From October 2017 to October 2019, 27,467 operations were performed. Of 220 patients with penicillin-anaphylactic histories reviewed prior to the full policy change, no statistically significant differences were reported in allergic reactions (P = .70), surgical site infections (P = 1.00), or adverse events (P = .32) with cefazolin compared to other antibiotics. Postpolicy implementation, cefazolin usage increased 18.2%, while vancomycin and clindamycin decreased by 11.4% and 62.0%, respectively. No anaphylaxis was documented in penicillin-allergic patients receiving cefazolin in either the review or quality assurance follow-up after the change. Of 3 patients developing reactions to cefazolin, none had histories of penicillin allergy. Surgical site infection rates were similar between pre and postpolicy time periods (P = .842).

Conclusion: Administration of cefazolin in penicillin-anaphylactic patients for surgical prophylaxis appears to be safe.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.022DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

penicillin-allergic patients
24
surgical prophylaxis
20
adverse events
12
cefazolin
11
patients
10
patients surgical
8
cefazolin surgical
8
prophylaxis penicillin-allergic
8
patients including
8
including anaphylaxis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!