Determinants of treatment modification before and after implementation of the updated 2015 NICE guideline on type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands; NUTRIM School for Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Published: June 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to explore patient-specific factors that affected changes in metformin treatment for type 2 diabetes patients before and after the 2015 NICE guidelines were introduced.
  • - Analysis of data from a population-based cohort (2009-2016) showed that after the updated guidelines, there was a notable shift in prescribing patterns, with a decrease in sulphonylureas use and an increase in newer medications like DPP-4 and SGLT-2 inhibitors.
  • - Findings suggest progress towards more personalized medication strategies, but indicate that some crucial factors influencing prescribing choices were not fully embraced by general practitioners even after the new guidelines were implemented.

Article Abstract

Aims: To identify patient-specific factors associated with early metformin treatment modification among type 2 diabetes patients before and after implementation of the updated 2015 NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) guideline.

Methods: We conducted a population-based cohort study using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database (2009-2016). Patients ≥ 18 years, newly treated with metformin only, during the period of valid data collection were included. The first prescription defined start of follow-up. Determinants of treatment modification in two cohorts (before and after implementation of the updated guideline) were studied by time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: After implementation of the updated guideline, patients were less likely to receive sulphonylureas (62.3% vs 41.3%) or thiazolidediones (4.7% vs 2.2%) and more likely to receive dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (15.8% vs 27.1%) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (0.8% vs 9.9%). Some determinants influenced general practitioners' prescribing differently after implementation of the updated guideline compared to before, including a high body mass index and heart failure.

Conclusions: Our results indicate that a first step towards tailored prescribing has been made. However, not all determinants that are important to consider when prescribing second-line glucose-lowering agents were of influence on general practitioners' prescribing.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108828DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

implementation updated
20
treatment modification
12
updated guideline
12
determinants treatment
8
updated 2015
8
2015 nice
8
type diabetes
8
cohort study
8
general practitioners'
8
practitioners' prescribing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!