Three Decades of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Academic Center Experience.

Clin Lung Cancer

Department of Medical Oncology, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: September 2021

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains a challenging disease to manage. In the past few decades, extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP), pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, and indwelling pleural catheters were introduced to MPM care with variable levels of efficacy and evidence.

Patients And Methods: This was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with MPM between January 1991 and March 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Data were examined by decade to assess trends in MPM demographics, management, and OS. A subgroup analysis was then conducted to examine the impact of EPP, pemetrexed, and indwelling pleural catheters on OS.

Results: The study included 337 patients; 309 patients had died at last follow-up (91.7%). Median age at diagnosis and the proportion of female patients increased from 65.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 57.1-73.7) and 11.6% female from 1991 to 1999 to 75 years (IQR, 68.1-80.6) and 20.5% female from 2010 to 2019. Median OS was largely unchanged in the three study periods: 9.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.9-12.7) in the 1991-1999 cohort, 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.6-13.2) in the 2000-2009 cohort, and 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.9-13.6) in the 2010-2019 cohort. Controlling for a number of demographic and prognostic factors, EPP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .02), pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.87; P = .007), and indwelling pleural catheters (HR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.13-0.71; P = .006) were each associated with improvements in OS.

Conclusion: Despite the small incremental improvements in survival shown by the three interventions we examined, prognosis remains guarded for MPM patients. Better modalities of management are needed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2021.03.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

indwelling pleural
12
pleural catheters
12
months 95%
12
malignant pleural
8
pleural mesothelioma
8
pemetrexed-based chemotherapy
8
95%
6
pleural
5
mpm
5
patients
5

Similar Publications

Tunneled Pleural Catheters: An Effective Nonsurgical Alternative for Nonexpandable Lung in Chronic Pleural Infection.

J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol

January 2025

Division of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School.

Background: Open window thoracostomy (OTW) is the standard of care for debilitated patients with chronic pleural infection and nonexpandable lungs (NEL) who are not candidates for major surgical intervention. Tunneled pleural catheters (TPC) offer tremendous treatment potential in this setting based on their efficacy in malignant pleural effusion and NEL. We aim to assess the efficacy, safety, and health care utilization of TPC in this setting.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is common in individuals with cancer and typically reflects advanced disease. Most cases are symptomatic, with dyspnea and pain having a severe effect on the patient's quality of life (QOL). The management of MPE aims to relieve symptoms, improve QOL, prevent repeated pleural interventions, and minimize hospital admissions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) of the clear cell type is the most common form of renal malignancy. Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) as the initial presentation of RCC is very rare. This case report presents a case of RCC that initially manifested as a pleural effusion, without the typical symptoms of flank pain, hematuria, or a palpable abdominal mass.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Malignant Pleural Effusion: Diagnosis and Treatment-Up-to-Date Perspective.

Curr Oncol

November 2024

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy.

Malignant pleural effusion is the presence of malignant cells within the pleural fluid, representing the second most common cause of pleural exudate. Although diagnostic methods and management techniques for malignant pleural effusion have dramatically improved over the decades, the current treatment is still palliative, aiming to remove pleural fluid, possibly prevent its recurrence, and alleviate symptoms through a wide range of available procedures. Treatment should be tailored to the individual patient, considering comorbidities, size of the effusion, rate of fluid accumulation, underlying cardiac or respiratory conditions, rate of recurrence, presence of loculations or trapped lung, tumor characteristics, cancer type, and patient preferences.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Little is known about patient outcomes following treatment of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) in the real-world setting.

Research Question: We aimed to compare post-procedure all-cause mortality between individuals who received indwelling pleural catheter (IPC) insertion versus chemical pleurodesis for managing MPEs.

Study Design And Methods: We performed a retrospective population-based study using provincial health administrative data (Ontario, Canada) of adults with a MPE who underwent IPC insertion or chemical pleurodesis between 2015 and 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!