Not by turnout alone: Measuring the sources of electoral change, 2012 to 2016.

Sci Adv

Department of Political Science and Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.

Published: April 2021

Changes in partisan outcomes between consecutive elections must come from changes in the composition of the electorate or changes in the vote choices of consistent voters. How much composition versus conversion drives electoral change has critical implications for the policy mandates of election victories and campaigning and governing strategies. Here, we analyze electoral change between the 2012 and 2016 U.S. presidential elections using administrative data. We merge precinct-level election returns, the smallest geography at which vote counts are available, with individual-level turnout records from 37 million registered voters in six key states. We find that both factors were substantively meaningful drivers of electoral change, but the balance varied by state. We estimate that pro-Republican Party (GOP) conversion among two-election voters was particularly important in states including Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania where the pro-GOP swings were largest. Our results suggest conversion remains a crucial component of electoral change.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8059927PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe3272DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

electoral change
20
change 2012
8
2012 2016
8
electoral
5
change
5
turnout measuring
4
measuring sources
4
sources electoral
4
2016 changes
4
changes partisan
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!