Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Nanoparticle-based delivery systems have shown great promise for theranostics and bioimaging on the laboratory scale due to favorable pharmacokinetics and biodistribution. In this study, we examine the utility of a cage-forming variant of the protein lumazine synthase, which was previously designed and evolved to encapsulate biomacromolecular cargo. Linking antibody-binding domains to the exterior of the cage enabled binding of targeting immunoglobulins and cell-specific uptake of encapsulated cargo. Protein nanocages displaying antibody-binding domains appear to be less immunogenic than their unmodified counterparts, but they also recruit serum antibodies that can mask the efficacy of the targeting antibody. Our study highlights the strengths and limitations of a common targeting strategy for practical nanoparticle-based delivery applications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acschembio.1c00007 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!