Long-term observation following perforation and rupture of the esophagus.

Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Odense, Denmark.

Published: July 1988

A follow-up study of 35 patients was performed 1.5 to 22 years after simple closure and drainage of the esophagus for nonmalignant intrathoracic perforation or rupture, with special attention to dysphagia. Of the seven patients with spontaneous rupture, only one required supplementary postoperative treatment, for severe reflux esophagitis. None of the eight patients with iatrogenic lesion and no prior esophageal disorder had any dysphagia postoperatively. Postoperative swallowing problems were absent in 13 of the 20 patients with perforation caused by examination or treatment of an already diseased esophagus. Four required repeated esophageal dilation and three underwent further surgery. Simple closure and drainage of nonmalignant intrathoracic perforation or rupture of the esophagus is concluded to be a safe procedure in regard to late postoperative dysphagia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14017438809106056DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

perforation rupture
12
rupture esophagus
8
simple closure
8
closure drainage
8
nonmalignant intrathoracic
8
intrathoracic perforation
8
long-term observation
4
perforation
4
observation perforation
4
rupture
4

Similar Publications

Aim: Branch atheromatous disease (BAD), characterized by the occlusion of perforating branches near the orifice of a parent artery, often develops early neurological deterioration because the mechanisms underlying BAD remain unclear. Abnormal wall shear stress (WSS) is strongly associated with endothelial dysfunction and plaque growth or rupture. Therefore, we hypothesized that computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling could detect differences in WSS between BAD and small-vessel occlusion (SVO), both of which result from perforating artery occlusion/stenosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms remain excellent candidates for microsurgical treatment, despite proliferation of new endovascular tools. Nonetheless, patients desire less invasive options for permanent, durable treatment of their aneurysms; this is particularly the case for those presenting without subarachnoid hemorrhage, and those with multiple aneurysms that may require several surgical approaches. Keyhole craniotomies, when properly utilized in well-selected patients, allow for minimally invasive treatment of both ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms, including those harboring bilateral aneurysms which may be treated from a single approach.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Basilar artery perforator aneurysms (BAPAs) are rare and may be occult on initial imaging due to their small size and susceptibility to intermittent thrombosis.1 2 Conventional treatments for aneurysms (eg, clipping or coiling) have proved challenging.3 Recently, endovascular electrocoagulation has been shown to be effective for BAPAs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Intrasaccular flow diversion using the woven endobridge device (WEB; MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms has demonstrated large scale safety and efficacy. However, limitations arise from its structural configuration, restricting its application to specific aneurysm sizes and shapes.

Technique Overview: We introduce the CUPCAKE technique, a combination of conventional coiling followed by WEB intrasaccular flow disruption in select cases of atypical aneurysms with technically challenging morphology not typically treatable by WEB alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cervical dilatation, uterine evacuation, and curettage (D&E&C) are common gynecological procedures for abortion, yet they carry risks of complications such as uterine perforation and intra-abdominal organ incarceration. Here, we report a rare case of a breastfeeding patient who had an embedded abdominal greater omentum in the anterior wall of the uterus and into the uterine cavity during D&E&C. We used combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic treatment for this case and successfully removed the embedded greater omentum.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!