A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effects of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma on palatal wound healing of free gingival grafts: a randomized controlled clinical trial. | LitMetric

Objective: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the effects of non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NAPP) on wound healing, epithelization, local pain, bleeding, and alteration of sensation in palatal donor site.

Materials And Methods: Forty patients with inadequate attached gingiva were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: (i) NAPP group (Free gingival graft [FGG] + NAPP) and (ii) control group (FGG alone). NAPP was performed immediately after the operation and on days 3 and 7. Pain, bleeding, and the amount of medication were recorded by patients every day. Epithelization in donor site, alteration of sensation and color match were assessed weekly for 2 months. Inter-group comparisons of continuous variables by time were performed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA test and a general linear model. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square exact test. A p value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: At week 2, the number of patients with complete epithelization was greater in the NAPP group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, color match in donor site was better in the NAPP group than in the control group (p < 0.05) during the first five follow-up assessments. No significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to bleeding, pain level, drug use, and alteration of sensation.

Conclusion: The NAPP application increased the epithelization and accelerated the wound healing process although it did not decrease the level of pain and sensation.

Clinical Relevance: Our data suggested that the NAPP application may help epithelization and thus may shorten the recovery time after oral surgeries.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03925-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wound healing
12
napp group
12
control group
12
effects non-thermal
8
non-thermal atmospheric
8
atmospheric pressure
8
pressure plasma
8
free gingival
8
napp
8
pain bleeding
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!