Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The National Diabetes Plan 2017-21 has implemented measures to improve diagnosis and follow-up of persons with type 2 diabetes by the primary health services. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences and thoughts of Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) with regard to diagnosis and follow-up of this patient group.
Material And Method: In this qualitative study, three focus-group interviews were conducted with a total of 17 GPs. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using systematic text condensation.
Results: The GPs reported having a busy daily schedule that rarely allowed for targeted identification of patients in the risk zone to be prioritised. They described a patient-centred diabetes care, in which motivating for lifestyle change was considered a necessary but demanding task. The doctors identified the need to find a balance between following the general clinical guidelines on the one hand and individually adapting the follow-up to each patient on the other. Furthermore, the participants reported being less updated on current medical knowledge than they wanted, due to time constraints.
Interpretation: The GPs in the study described a patient-centred diabetes care that was driven by clinical experience. The guidelines have an advisory, but not mandatory function. This approach enables personalised and adapted treatment, but could also be a contributory cause of the failure to provide sufficient follow-up as required by the national guidelines.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.4045/tidsskr.20.0623 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!