Given humans' limited ability to recall past experiences for evaluation, scholars have proposed the peak-end rule stating that if perceived discomfort at the end of an aversive experience is lower than the peak discomfort experienced, the aversive experience will be remembered more positively. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the peak-end rule as applied to high-intensity interval exercise (HIIE). Participants were 30 inactive men ( age = 27.9, 5.2 years). In the first session they performed a graded exercise test on cycle-ergometer to determine their maximal aerobic power (MAP) ( = 233,  = 35W); and, in the second and third sessions, they performed two HIIE protocols in randomized order: (a) Short trial - 20-minutes of HIIE, composed of 30-second efforts at 100% of MAP interspersed by 30-seconds of passive recovery; and (b) Long trial - 20-minutes of the short trial, plus 10-minutes more of HIIE, decreasing 3% of MAP in each additional bout, resulting in 70% of MAP in the last bout. During exercise, we recorded the participants' rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and affect, using the Feeling Scale (FS). At 30-minutes post-exercise, we again recorded the participants' affect, using the Global Affect Evaluation (GAE) and their session-RPE, and we recorded their enjoyment, using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES). In the last session, the participants chose a favorite protocol to repeat. All sessions were interspersed by at least 72 hours. The 10-minutes extra HIIE in the Long-trial condition resulted decreased heart rate values ( = 157,  = 13bpm to  = 144,  = 14bpm; p < 0.001), but psychological responses during and after exercise did not differ, nor did participants' preferred HIIE protocol. As the load drop for the Long-trial was not enough to change the psychological responses during exercise, there was no difference in the retrospective evaluation as the peak-end rule would have suggested.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00315125211010047DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peak-end rule
12
high-intensity interval
8
interval exercise
8
aversive experience
8
short trial
8
trial 20-minutes
8
recorded participants'
8
exercise
5
hiie
5
exercise remembered
4

Similar Publications

A review of the peak-end rule in mental health contexts.

Curr Opin Psychol

August 2024

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, 4250 Plymouth Rd., Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • The peak-end rule suggests that people tend to remember experiences based on the most intense moments (peaks) and how they end, rather than the entire experience itself.
  • This concept has not been thoroughly explored in mental health, particularly in how individuals recall their symptoms over time.
  • Research into the peak-end rule could enhance therapeutic techniques and inform better assessment methods in clinical settings, requiring a deeper understanding of its biases in various contexts and individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A probabilistic model of relapse in drug addiction.

Math Biosci

June 2024

Department of Computational Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, 90095-1766, CA, USA; Department of Mathematics, California State University at Northridge, Los Angeles, 91330, CA, USA. Electronic address:

More than 60% of individuals recovering from substance use disorder relapse within one year. Some will resume drug consumption even after decades of abstinence. The cognitive and psychological mechanisms that lead to relapse are not completely understood, but stressful life experiences and external stimuli that are associated with past drug-taking are known to play a primary role.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Calves peak-end memory of pain.

Sci Rep

April 2023

Animal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z6, Canada.

In humans, the 'peak-end' rule states that recollection of an experience is most often influenced by the peak (the most intense moment) and end of the experience. We investigated whether calves followed the peak-end rule in their memory of a painful procedure: disbudding. As proxies for retrospective and 'real-time' reports of pain, we used conditioned place aversion, and reflex pain behaviours.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!