Background: Use of a #15 blade is the most popular way for making skin incisions in dermatology. For finer and more accurate incisions, a #15c blade can be used. However, there is no evidence that demonstrates the superiority of the #15c blade over the #15 blade.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the skin incisions made with a #15 blade and #15c blade using varied magnifications.

Methods And Materials: Twenty fresh chicken thighs with intact skin were used in this study. Incisions were made on the skin using #15 and #15c blades with ×1.0, ×2.5, and ×5.0 magnification. The accuracy of the incision (length and depth) made by the different scalpel blades and magnifications was analyzed using the 2 × 3 chi-squared test. Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine factors of the incision depth and length.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found in the evaluations of length or depth using the 2 × 3 chi-squared test. However, the multiple logistic regression analyses showed that the incision length and depth were associated with use of the #15c scalpel blade.

Conclusion: Use of a #15c scalpel blade with ×5.0 magnification is recommended for making incisions when less than 1- to 2-mm accuracy is required.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000002993DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

#15c scalpel
12
skin incisions
12
#15c blade
12
length depth
12
scalpel blades
8
#15 blade
8
×50 magnification
8
incision length
8
chi-squared test
8
logistic regression
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!