Background: A severity grading system for liver surgery-specific complications, given the acronym FABIB, has been standardized to increase the feasibility and comparability of academic reports in liver surgery. Whether the FABIB score is associated with long-term survival following major hepatectomy has not been previously investigated.
Methods: 297 consecutive patients who had undergone major hepatectomy between 2012 and 2019 were recruited. The postoperative complications were documented according to the FABIB system and, for comparison purposes, Clavien-Dindo classification. Their influence on 90-day mortality and long-term survival was analyzed retrospectively.
Results: Taking the relevant confounders into account, the FABIB score was a robust factor associated with long-term survival after major hepatectomy: patients with high FABIB scores (≥6) had a 2.415-fold higher risk of death compared to patients with low FABIB scores (≤2) (P = 0.002). In contrast to that, the Clavien-Dindo Classification (grade III + IV vs. grade I + II) was not associated with survival in our cohort (P = 0.873).
Conclusion: Liver surgery-specific complications, measured by the FABIB system, impact long-term survival after major hepatectomy independent of relevant confounders. We propose the FABIB score as a composite endpoint for randomized controlled trials and a quality assessment tool in liver surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2021.02.013 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!