The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of cementless medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK.

Published: February 2023

Purpose: Given an increasingly overweight population, unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) are being performed in patients with higher body mass indices (BMIs). There are concerns that cemented fixation will not last. Cementless fixation may offer a solution, but the long term results in different BMI groups has not been assessed. We studied the effect of BMI on the outcomes of cementless UKRs.

Methods: A prospective cohort of 1000 medial cementless mobile-bearing UKR with a mean follow up of 6.6 years (SD 2.7) were analysed. UKRs were categorised into four BMI groups: (1) ≥ 18.5 to < 25 kg/m (normal), (2) 25 to < 30 kg/m (overweight), (3) 30 to < 35 kg/m (obese class 1) and (4) ≥ 35 kg/m (obese class 2). Implant survival was assessed using endpoints reoperation and revision. Functional outcomes were assessed.

Results: Ten-year cumulative revision rate for the normal (n = 186), overweight (n = 434), obese class 1 (n = 213) and obese class 2 (n = 127) groups were 1.8% (CI 0.4-7.4), 2.6% (CI 1.3-5.1), 3.8% (CI 1.5-9.2) and 1.7% (CI 0.4-6.8) with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.79). The 10-year cumulative reoperation rates were 2.7% (CI 0.8-8.2), 3.8% (CI 2.2-6.6), 5.2% (CI 2.5-10.7) and 1.7% (CI 0.4-6.8) with no significant differences between groups (p = 0.44). The 10-year median Oxford Knee Score were 43.0, 46.0, 44.0 and 38.0 respectively.

Conclusion: Cementless mobile-bearing UKR has low 10-year reoperation and revision rates across in all BMI groups, and there are no significant differences between the groups. Although higher BMI groups had slightly worse functional outcomes, the improvement in function compared to preoperatively  tended to be better. This study suggests that BMI should not be considered a contraindication for the cementless mobile-bearing UKR.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9898366PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06549-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body mass
8
outcomes cementless
8
unicompartmental knee
8
knee replacements
8
bmi groups
8
mass outcomes
4
cementless
4
cementless medial
4
medial mobile-bearing
4
mobile-bearing unicompartmental
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!