A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The 'swirl sign' as a marker for haematoma expansion and outcome in intra-cranial haemorrhage: A meta-analysis. | LitMetric

The 'swirl sign' as a marker for haematoma expansion and outcome in intra-cranial haemorrhage: A meta-analysis.

J Clin Neurosci

Royal College of Surgeons Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; National Neurosurgical Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.

Published: May 2021

The 'swirl sign' is a CT imaging finding associated with haematoma expansion and poor prognosis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine its prognostic value. PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until 16/12/2020 for related articles. Articles detailing the relationship between the swirl sign and any of haematoma expansion (HE), neurological outcome in the form of Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) or mortality were included. A meta-analysis was performed and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated for each of HE, GOS and mortality. 15 papers were assessed. Nine papers related to HE, for which the pooled sensitivity was 50% (95% CI 30-71), specificity was 77% (95%CI 67-85) and PLR was 2.16 (95%CI 1.89-2.42). There was significant heterogeneity (I = 70%, Q = 26.9). Three papers related to GOS, for which the pooled sensitivity was 45% (95%CI 20-74), specificity was 78.3% (95%CI 40-95.2) and PLR was 1.77 (95%CI 1.04-2.62). Three papers related to mortality, for which the pooled sensitivity was 65% (95% CI 32-88), specificity was 75% (95%CI 42-92) and pooled PLR was 2.64 (95%CI 1.60-4.13). Our findings indicated that the swirl sign is a useful prognostic marker in the radiological evaluation of intracranial haemorrhage. However, more research is needed to assess its independence from other risk factors for haematoma expansion.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.02.028DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

haematoma expansion
16
pooled sensitivity
16
'swirl sign'
8
swirl sign
8
gos mortality
8
likelihood ratio
8
three papers
8
95%ci
7
pooled
5
sign' marker
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!