Antimicrobial and resource utilization with T2 magnetic resonance for rapid diagnosis of bloodstream infections: systematic review with meta-analysis of controlled studies.

To compare antimicrobial and resource utilization with T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MR) versus blood culture (BC) in patients with suspected bloodstream infection. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for randomized trials or observational controlled studies of patients with suspected bloodstream infection receiving a diagnosis with T2MR or BC. Using an inverse variance meta-analysis model, we reported mortality using the risk ratio (RR) and the remaining outcomes as the mean difference (MD). Fourteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Time to detection (MD = -81 hours; p < 0.001) and time to species identification (MD = -77 hours; p < 0.001) were faster with T2MR. Patients testing positive on T2MR received targeted antimicrobial therapy faster (-42 hours; p < 0.001) and patients testing negative on T2MR were de-escalated from empirical therapy faster (-7 hours; p = 0.02) vs. BC. Length of intensive care unit stay (MD = -5.0 days; p = 0.03) and hospital stay (MD = -4.8 days; p = 0.03) were shorter with T2MR. Mortality rates were comparable between T2MR and BC (28.9% vs. 29.9%, RR = 1.02, p = 0.86). Utilization of T2MR for identification of bloodstream pathogens provides faster time to detection, faster transition to targeted microbial therapy, faster de-escalation of empirical therapy, shorter ICU and hospital stay, and with comparable mortality rate versus BC.