A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Serum Concentrations of Ustekinumab Obtained by Three Commercial Assays in Patients with Crohn's Disease. | LitMetric

Background: Data on the association of ustekinumab (UST) drug concentrations and clinical outcomes are conflicting. We assessed serum UST drug and anti-UST antibody concentrations using three commercially available assays.

Methods: Sixty-one blood samples were analyzed for serum UST drug and anti-UST antibody concentrations using three assays: one homogeneous mobility shift assay (HMSA, Prometheus, Assay A), and two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA; Progenika, Dynacare, Assay B and Theradiag, Assay C).

Results: The median (IQR) serum UST concentrations for the three assays were: Assay A 7.50 (5.35 to 12.88) µg/mL, Assay B 4.02 (2.46 to 6.95) µg/mL and Assay C 4.35 (2.62 to 7.50) µg/mL. A Kruskal-Wallis test confirmed a statistically significant difference between the different assays, X(2) = 30.606, < 0.001. Linear regression showed near twofold increased difference in the absolute drug concentrations between the HMSA and either ELISA. Linear quantitative correlation was observed for all three assays ( = 0.836 for A versus B, = 0.792 for A versus C, = 0.936 for B versus C; < 0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between assay A and B was 0.649 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.208 to 0.874); assay A and C was 0.671 (95% CI -0.165 to 0.878); and assay B and C was 0.958 (95% CI 0.928 to 0.975); < 0.001. No anti-UST antibodies were detected.

Conclusion: A good correlation was observed for serum UST drug concentrations and a good agreement was observed between the ELISA tests. However, agreement was poor between the HMSA and each ELISA tests. Clinical recommendations regarding drug concentrations should be based on assay type used.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023823PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwaa003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ust drug
16
drug concentrations
16
serum ust
16
concentrations three
12
three assays
12
assay
11
concentrations
8
drug anti-ust
8
anti-ust antibody
8
antibody concentrations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!