AI Article Synopsis

  • Therapeutic options for previously treated multiple myeloma have limited effectiveness and can cause serious side effects, like peripheral neuropathy.
  • In the Phase 3 BOSTON study, the combination of selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (XVd) significantly outperformed the standard treatment (Vd) in terms of progression-free survival, response rates, and severity of side effects.
  • XVd showed the most benefits for patients with fewer previous treatments, especially those who hadn't received a proteasome inhibitor or prior stem cell transplant, suggesting it may be a better option for early treatment phases.

Article Abstract

Therapeutic regimens for previously treated multiple myeloma (MM) may not provide prolonged disease control and are often complicated by significant adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy. In patients with previously treated MM in the Phase 3 BOSTON study, once weekly selinexor, once weekly bortezomib, and 40 mg dexamethasone (XVd) demonstrated a significantly longer median progression-free survival (PFS), higher response rates, deeper responses, a trend to improved survival, and reduced incidence and severity of bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy when compared with standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg dexamethasone (Vd). The pre-specified analyses described here evaluated the influence of the number of prior lines of therapy, prior treatment with lenalidomide, prior proteasome inhibitor (PI) therapy, prior immunomodulatory drug therapy, and prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) on the efficacy and safety of XVd compared with Vd. In this 1:1 randomized study, enrolled patients were assigned to receive once weekly oral selinexor (100 mg) with once weekly subcutaneous bortezomib (1.3 mg/m) and 40 mg per week dexamethasone (XVd) versus standard twice weekly bortezomib and 80 mg per week dexamethasone (Vd). XVd significantly improved PFS, overall response rate, time-to-next-treatment, and showed reduced all grade and grade ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy compared with Vd regardless of prior treatments, but the benefits of XVd over Vd were more pronounced in patients treated earlier in their disease course who had either received only one prior therapy, had never been treated with a PI, or had prior ASCT. Treatment with XVd improved outcomes as compared to Vd regardless of prior therapies as well as manageable and generally reversible adverse events. XVd was associated with clinical benefit and reduced peripheral neuropathy compared to standard Vd in previously treated MM. These results suggest that the once weekly XVd regimen may be optimally administered to patients earlier in their course of disease, as their first bortezomib-containing regimen, and in those relapsing after ASCT.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03110562). Registered 12 April 2017. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03110562 .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8045319PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01071-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peripheral neuropathy
16
weekly bortezomib
12
dexamethasone xvd
12
neuropathy compared
12
therapy prior
12
prior
10
prior treatments
8
treated multiple
8
multiple myeloma
8
adverse events
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!