Objectives: Silicone airway stents are used to manage central airway stenosis or obstruction, although their impact on long-term survival remains unknown in patients with central airway stenosis or obstruction due to thoracic malignancy. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of silicone stents on survival.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 106 patients with central airway stenosis or obstruction due to thoracic malignancy treated by stenting at Toho University Omori Medical Center between 1998 and 2018.
Results: Patients treated with silicone stents had significantly higher survival rates than patients treated with metallic stents (p = 0.0173). Silicone stents patients also had significantly more additional treatments for thoracic malignancy after stenting than metallic stents patients (p = 0.0007). Notably, significantly more silicone stents patients underwent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy (p = 0.0268, p = 0.0300). During multivariate analyses, the additional treatment, including chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy, was an independent optimal prognostic factor.
Conclusions: Silicone stents patients had significantly higher survival rates than metallic stents patients. Although stenting for airway stenosis or obstruction due to thoracic malignancy may be mainly palliative, additional treatments after stenting should be considered to improve the prognoses of patients with airway stenosis or obstruction due to thoracic malignancy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11748-021-01634-0 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!