A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

His-purkinje system pacing upgrade improve the heart performances in patients suffering from pacing-induced cardiomyopathy with or without permanent atrial fibrillation. | LitMetric

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of his-purkinje system pacing (HPSP) upgrades in patients with pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are still unknown.

Methods And Results: Patients with PICM were continuously enrolled from January 2018 to March 2020. All patients were further divided into AF subgroup and sinus rhythm subgroup. Clinical data including echocardiographic examination parameters, electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, were assessed before and after the procedure. The HPSP upgrades, including his bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) were completed in 34 of 36 (94%) patients, Complications including electrode dislodged, perforation, infection or thrombosis were not observed in the perioperative period. During a mean of 11.52 ± 5.40 months of follow-up. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased significantly (33.76 ± 7.54 vs 40.41 ± 9.06, P < 0.001), and the QRS duration decreased (184.22 ± 23.76 ms vs 120.52 ± 16.67 ms, P < 0.001) after the upgrades. LVEDD reversed from 59.29 ± 7.74 mm to 53.91 ± 5.92 mm (P < 0.001), and the NYHA functional class also improved to 2.00 ± 0.76 from 2.55 ± 0.91 at the first follow-up (P < 0.001). The left atrium (LA) size also slightly decreased compared to the initial state (47.44 ± 7.14 mm VS 45.56 ± 7.78, P = 0.010). BNP significantly decreased from a median value of 458.06(256.35-755.10) to 172.31(92.69-552.14) (P = 0.004). The threshold did not increase significantly (1.18 ± 0.76 mv@0.4 ms vs 1.26 ± 0.91mv @ 0.4 ms, P = 0.581). These improvements in patients with AF were similar with those in patients without AF (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: HPSP upgrades improved the heart performance and reversed the left ventricular remodeling in patients suffering from PICM with or without AF, and it should be a promising choice in these patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.04.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hpsp upgrades
12
patients
9
his-purkinje system
8
system pacing
8
patients suffering
8
pacing-induced cardiomyopathy
8
atrial fibrillation
8
left ventricular
8
pacing
4
pacing upgrade
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!