Cemented hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture patients: collarless, polished tapered stem (CPT) versus anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP2).

Background: Cemented hemiarthroplasty is a well-documented treatment for patients with femoral neck fractures (FNFs). However, there are not many cohort studies comparing different types of hemiarthroplasty (HA).

Objective: To compare CPT and Lubinus SP2 HA for FNF patients concerning complications and radiological measurements.

Methods: From January 1, 2013, CPT was introduced instead of Lubinus SP2 as the new cemented HA due to a regional procurement. Data were retrieved 3 years prior and after the introduction. All patient health records were retrospectively reviewed for types of implant, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score and duration of admission. All X-ray images were analyzed for radiological measurements concerning offset, stem angulation and cement filling. Mortality and major complications within 1 year were retrieved from patient health records as well as the Danish National Patient Registry. Major complications were defined as dislocations, periprosthetic fractures and revisions.

Results: 584 cemented HA were included, 300 CPT and 284 with Lubinus SP2. The mean age (SD) was 82 (8.2) years, and there was no baseline difference between the groups concerning age, sex, ASA score and mortality. There were 8.7% major complications for CPT and 9.2% for Lubinus SP2 (p = 0.836). There were, however, seven periprosthetic fractures in the CPT group and one in the Lubinus SP2 group (p = 0.04). In contrast, there were 20 dislocations in the Lubinus SP2 group and 10 in the CPT group (p = 0.042). There was no statistical difference between the stem angulation and periprosthetic fractures (p = 0.824) or major complications (p = 0.602). The Lubinus SP2 had a mean plus 2.7 mm offset postoperatively (p = 0.001), while the CPT had plus 10.6 mm (p < 0.000). The mean (SD) angle of the stems was 1.39 (1.75) degrees for Lubinus SP2 and 2.46 (1.99) for CPT. There was no difference in cementation (p = 0.308).

Conclusion: There was no overall statistical difference between the CPT and Lubinus SP2 stem regarding major complications. However, the CPT had a higher prevalence of periprosthetic fractures, while the Lubinus SP2 had a higher dislocation prevalence. The CPT stem had overcorrection of offset and a higher degree of varus positioning.