Introduction: Assessment of the pressure-volume index (PVI) during lumbar infusion study (LIS) has been proposed to evaluate the overall compliance of the cranio-spinal system. It is calculated from the measurement of CSF pressure changes, ΔP from Pb to Pp, in response to repeated bolus injections of a volume (ΔV) within the lumbar subarachnoid space.
Material And Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 18 patients who underwent LIS for suspicion of normal pressure hydrocephalus, including a series of three fast bolus injections of 3 mL of saline at different levels of CSF pressure. We compared two methods for PVI calculation: (a) PVI using the slope α of a linear fit ΔP = α(Pb - P ), PVI = ΔV/log(α + 1); (b) PVI using the PVI calculated independently for each bolus injection assuming P = 0, PVI = mean(ΔV/log(Pp/Pb)).
Results: We found a significant discrepancy between the two methods: the average difference (PVI - PVI) was -3.93 mL (95% confidence interval [8.77; -16.64]). In the PVI, method, the mean P was 2.12 mmHg (±3.41 mmHg).
Discussion: The clinical reliability of PVI (assuming P = 0) depends on the value of P . PVI provides results, independent of P . Future studies should focus on determining pathological PVI range rather than fixed cut-off values.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_64 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!