Directly eliciting individuals' subjective beliefs via surveys is increasingly popular in social science research, but doing so via face-to-face surveys has an important downside: the interviewer's knowledge of the topic may spill over onto the respondent's recorded beliefs. Using a randomized experiment that used interviewers to implement an information treatment, we show that reported beliefs are significantly shifted by interviewer knowledge. Trained interviewers primed respondents to use the exact numbers used in the training, nudging them away from higher answers; recorded responses decreased by about 0.3 standard deviations of the initial belief distribution. Furthermore, respondents with stronger prior beliefs were less affected by interviewer knowledge. We suggest corrections for this issue from the perspectives of interviewer recruitment, survey design, and experiment setup.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8041053 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00703370-8932274 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Barriers and facilitators to sustaining a lupus patient decision aid in regular rheumatology outpatient care in the US.
Rheumatology (Oxford)
January 2025
Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Objective: This study investigates the barriers and facilitators to sustaining a decision aid (DA) tool for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in routine rheumatology outpatient care across the U.S. The DA was initially developed for assisting Patients with SLE in making informed medication choices by providing personalized information on their treatment process.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFUnderstanding the PrEP Care Continuum for Adults: Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Barriers, Facilitators, and Missed Opportunities.
AIDS Patient Care STDS
January 2025
Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Science, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective strategy in reducing HIV transmission, yet its uptake remains suboptimal. Health care providers play a vital role in facilitating PrEP access and care. This qualitative study explores health care providers' perspectives on the oral PrEP care continuum for adults, emphasizing barriers, facilitators, and missed opportunities in PrEP implementation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEquitable Access to Sports: Youth Gymnastics Coaches' Perceptions on Promoting Inclusivity for Athletes with Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Phys Occup Ther Pediatr
January 2025
Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA.
Aims: The purpose of the study was to explore youth gymnastics coaches' perceptions on inclusive sports participation following an educational module. The study aims to explore implications for occupational therapy professionals' role in inclusive sports.
Methods: A qualitative descriptive approach was utilized with convenience sampling occurring through online platforms.
Internationally, vaccination rates among adolescents with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) are lower than those of the general population. Little research has addressed this issue. This study investigates the experiences of vaccinating adolescents with IDD in special education settings in Australia, with a focus on student engagement.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDefining and responding to the contextual drivers for implementation of antimicrobial stewardship in 14 neonatal units in South Africa.
JAC Antimicrob Resist
February 2025
Division of Medical Microbiology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Background: Research on the contextual drivers of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programme interventions in neonatal units is limited.
Methods: As part of a prospective mixed-methods multidisciplinary neonatal AMS (NeoAMS) interventional study in 14 South African hospitals, we applied a three-phased process to assess implementation barriers and contextual drivers experienced by participating health professionals. The study included: (Phase one; P1) a survey of pre-intervention barriers and enablers; (P2) written feedback during the study intervention phase; and (P3) semi-structured exit interviews.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!