AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study assessed an AI algorithm's effectiveness in detecting breath sounds in children with pulmonary diseases, using data collected at the Shanghai Children's Medical Center from May to December 2019.
  • - A total of 112 children contributed 672 breath sound recordings, with the AI showing a detection accuracy of 77.7%, significantly outperforming general pediatricians who had an accuracy of 59.9%.
  • - Results indicated that the AI's performance varied by patient age, with the highest accuracy (81.3%) observed in children under 12 months, especially in identifying specific sounds like crackles and wheezes.

Article Abstract

Lung auscultation plays an important role in the diagnosis of pulmonary diseases in children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for the detection of breath sounds in a real clinical environment among children with pulmonary diseases. The auscultations of breath sounds were collected in the respiratory department of Shanghai Children's Medical Center (SCMC) by using an electronic stethoscope. The discrimination results for all chest locations with respect to a gold standard (GS) established by 2 experienced pediatric pulmonologists from SCMC and 6 general pediatricians were recorded. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and F1-score of the AI algorithm and general pediatricians with respect to the GS were evaluated. Meanwhile, the performance of the AI algorithm for different patient ages and recording locations was evaluated. A total of 112 hospitalized children with pulmonary diseases were recruited for the study from May to December 2019. A total of 672 breath sounds were collected, and 627 (93.3%) breath sounds, including 159 crackles (23.1%), 264 wheeze (38.4%), and 264 normal breath sounds (38.4%), were fully analyzed by the AI algorithm. The accuracy of the detection of adventitious breath sounds by the AI algorithm and general pediatricians with respect to the GS were 77.7% and 59.9% ( < 0.001), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score in the detection of crackles and wheeze from the AI algorithm were higher than those from the general pediatricians (crackles 81.1 vs. 47.8%, 94.1 vs. 77.1%, and 80.9 vs. 42.74%, respectively; wheeze 86.4 vs. 82.2%, 83.0 vs. 72.1%, and 80.9 vs. 72.5%, respectively; < 0.001). Performance varied according to the age of the patient, with patients younger than 12 months yielding the highest accuracy (81.3%, < 0.001) among the age groups. In a real clinical environment, children's breath sounds were collected and transmitted remotely by an electronic stethoscope; these breath sounds could be recognized by both pediatricians and an AI algorithm. The ability of the AI algorithm to analyze adventitious breath sounds was better than that of the general pediatricians.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8023046PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.627337DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breath sounds
40
general pediatricians
20
pulmonary diseases
12
sounds collected
12
breath
10
sounds
10
artificial intelligence
8
algorithm
8
real clinical
8
clinical environment
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!