Neuroimaging evidence for a network sampling theory of individual differences in human intelligence test performance.

Nat Commun

The Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Brain Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Published: April 2021

Despite a century of research, it remains unclear whether human intelligence should be studied as one dominant, several major, or many distinct abilities, and how such abilities relate to the functional organisation of the brain. Here, we combine psychometric and machine learning methods to examine in a data-driven manner how factor structure and individual variability in cognitive-task performance relate to dynamic-network connectomics. We report that 12 sub-tasks from an established intelligence test can be accurately multi-way classified (74%, chance 8.3%) based on the network states that they evoke. The proximities of the tasks in behavioural-psychometric space correlate with the similarities of their network states. Furthermore, the network states were more accurately classified for higher relative to lower performing individuals. These results suggest that the human brain uses a high-dimensional network-sampling mechanism to flexibly code for diverse cognitive tasks. Population variability in intelligence test performance relates to the fidelity of expression of these task-optimised network states.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8024400PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22199-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

network states
16
intelligence test
12
human intelligence
8
test performance
8
network
5
neuroimaging evidence
4
evidence network
4
network sampling
4
sampling theory
4
theory individual
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!