Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term results with a minimum of ten years follow-up of primary Bologna-Oxford (BOX) TAA.
Methods: Between December 2004 and December 2009, 80 patients (82 ankles) underwent a primary BOX TAA performed by a single senior surgeon, expert in foot and ankle surgery. Pain and functional outcomes were analysed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system, Foot Functional Index Disability and Pain (FFI-Disability, FFI-Pain) score for comparative analysis.
Results: A total of 52 patients (54 implants) in a cohort of 80 (82 implants) were examined at a minimum ten years follow-up. Twenty implants out of 54 underwent implant failure (37 %) and 34 patients were enrolled in the present study. The mean VAS for pain decreased significantly from 8.5 ± 1.2 to 2.9 ± 2.2 (p<0.01) and the mean AFOAS score changed from 28.6 ± 11.8 pre-operatively to 72.7 ± 16.9 (p<0.01) at last follow-up. Ninety-seven percent was satisfied with a mean FFI-Disability score that improved from 77.6 ± 19.3 to 26.7 ± 25.4 (p<0.01) and FFI-Pain score that decreased from 76.2 ± 14.2 to 31.4 ± 25.6 (p<0.01). We calculated post-operative alignment using alpha, beta and gamma angles with no difference at long-term follow-up. The survival rate of the implant was 66% at ten years of follow-up.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that BOX TAA is an implant with a good patient satisfaction rate at long-term follow-up; therefore, it is a valid option to increase the quality of life in subjects with end-stage osteoarthritis; however, long-term survivorship is unsatisfactory when compared to modern knee and hip implant.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05033-1 | DOI Listing |
Int Orthop
May 2021
Department of Orthopedics, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20100, Milan, Italy.
Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term results with a minimum of ten years follow-up of primary Bologna-Oxford (BOX) TAA.
Methods: Between December 2004 and December 2009, 80 patients (82 ankles) underwent a primary BOX TAA performed by a single senior surgeon, expert in foot and ankle surgery. Pain and functional outcomes were analysed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system, Foot Functional Index Disability and Pain (FFI-Disability, FFI-Pain) score for comparative analysis.
Int Orthop
October 2019
Foot & Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Brockley Hill, Stanmore, HA7 4LP, UK.
Purpose: The Bologna-Oxford (BOX®) total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a three-component mobile-bearing implant gaining popularity in Europe. We aimed to analyse the outcomes of this TAA.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed data on 34 consecutive BOX® TAAs performed at a single centre with a mean follow-up of 58 months.
J Bone Joint Surg Br
June 2012
IRCCS Galeazzi, Department of Ankle and Foot Surgery, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy.
The Bologna-Oxford (BOX) total ankle replacement (TAR) was developed with the aim of achieving satisfactory pain-free movement of the ankle. To date, only one single multicentre study has reported its clinical results. The aim of this study was to conduct an independent review of its mid-term results.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!