Middle-age people with multiple sclerosis demonstrate similar mobility characteristics to neurotypical older adults.

Background: Clinical trials often report significant mobility differences between neurotypical and atypical groups, however, these analyses often do not determine which measures are capable of discriminating between groups. Additionally, indirect evidence supports the notion that some mobility impaired populations demonstrate similar mobility deficits. Thus, the current study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of three distinct aspects of mobility (walking, turning, and balance) to determine which variables were significantly different and were also able to discriminate between neurotypical older adults (OA) and middle-aged people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), and between middle-aged neurotypical adults and PwMS.

Methods: This study recruited 21 neurotypical OA, 19 middle-aged neurotypical adults, and 30 people with relapsing remitting MS. Participants came into the laboratory on two separate occasions to complete mobility testing while wearing wireless inertial sensors. Testing included a self-selected pace two-minute walk, a series of 180˚ and 360˚ turns, and a clinical balance test capturing a total of 99 distinct mobility characteristics. We determined significant differences for gait and turning measures through univariate analyses and a series of repeated measures analysis of variance in determining significance for balance conditions and measures. In determining discrimination between groups, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) was calculated for all individual mobility measures with a threshold of 0.80, denoting excellent discrimination. Additionally, a stepwise regression of the top five AUC producing variables was performed to determine whether a combination of variables could enhance discrimination while accounting for multicollinearity.

Results: The results between neurotypical OA and middle-aged PwMS demonstrated significant differences for three gait and one turning variable, with no variable or combination of variables able to provide excellent discrimination between groups. Between middle-age neurotypical adults and PwMS a variety of mean and variability gait measures demonstrated significant differences between groups; however, no variable or combination of variables met discriminatory threshold. For turning, five 360˚ turn variables demonstrated significant differences and furthermore, the combination of 360˚ mean turn duration and variability of peak turn velocity were able to discriminate between groups. Finally, the majority of postural sway measures demonstrated significant group differences and the ability to discriminate between groups, particularly during more challenging balance conditions where participants stood on a compliant surface.

Conclusion: These results offer a comprehensive analysis of mobility differences and measures capable of discriminating between middle-age neurotypical adults and PwMS. Additionally, these results provide evidence that OA and middle-age PwMS display similar movement characteristics and thus a potential indicator of advanced aging from a mobility perspective.