AI Article Synopsis

  • - Recent research reviews the potential use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in head and neck procedures, as previous evaluations focused on its application in other medical fields like urology and gynecology.
  • - The review highlights a significant gap in large-scale, randomized trials for RAS in head and neck surgery, with most existing studies comprising small case series that lack proper comparison to standard surgical methods.
  • - Additionally, issues regarding financial reimbursement for RAS remain unresolved, and the current robotic systems on the market need specific enhancements to be more effective in head and neck surgeries.

Article Abstract

In the past few years, surgical robots have recently entered the medical field, particularly in urology, gynecology, and general surgery. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in the field of head and neck surgery has not been clearly established. In this review, we evaluate to what extent RAS can potentially be applied in head and neck surgery, in which fields it is already daily routine and what advantages can be seen in comparison to conventional surgery. For this purpose, we conducted a systematic review of trials published between 2000 and 2021, as well as currently ongoing trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov. The results were structured according to anatomical regions, for the topics "Costs," "current clinical trials," and "robotic research" we added separate sections for the sake of clarity. Our findings show a lack of large-scale systematic randomized trials on the use of robots in head and neck surgery. Most studies include small case series or lack a control arm which enables a comparison with established standard procedures. The question of financial reimbursement is still not answered and the systems on the market still require some specific improvements for the use in head and neck surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8003460PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061398DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

head neck
20
neck surgery
16
systematic review
8
surgery
7
head
5
neck
5
current advances
4
advances robotics
4
robotics head
4
neck surgery-a
4

Similar Publications

Montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) approved for the treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis, is widely used, though real-world data on its application in asthma management remain limited. This registry-based study evaluated the use of montelukast in adult asthma patients, examining demographic and disease characteristics, asthma control status, asthma phenotypes, presence of atopy, and treatment regimens. Among 2053 patients analyzed, 61.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music Perception.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

January 2025

Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

Importance: Cochlear implants enable improvements in speech perception, but music perception outcomes remain variable. Image-guided cochlear implant programming has emerged as a potential programming strategy for increasing the quality of spectral information delivered through the cochlear implant to improve outcomes.

Objectives: To perform 2 experiments, the first of which modeled the variance in music perception scores as a function of electrode positioning factors, and the second of which evaluated image-guided cochlear implant programming as a strategy to improve music perception with a cochlear implant.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Noise Exposure History and Age-Related Changes to Hearing.

JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

January 2025

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.

Importance: Noise exposure is a major modifiable risk factor for hearing loss, yet it is not known whether it affects the rate of hearing decline in aging.

Objective: To determine the association of noise exposure history with the rate of pure-tone threshold change per year.

Design, Setting, And Participants: This longitudinal cohort study was conducted in the ongoing community-based Medical University of South Carolina Longitudinal Cohort Study of Age-Related Hearing Loss (1988 to present with the sample based in Charleston, South Carolina, and surrounding area).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!