AI Article Synopsis

  • The text discusses challenges in low-cycle multiaxial fatigue criteria related to adding normal and shear strains, traditionally handled using weighting factors.
  • It highlights that normal strain is a longitudinal strain while shear strain represents a rotation angle, leading to a need for a new method.
  • The proposed solution involves using complex numbers, where normal strain is the real part and shear strain is the imaginary part, allowing for an equivalent strain expression consistent with previous criteria by Macha.

Article Abstract

In the case of many low-cycle multiaxial fatigue criteria, we encounter a mathematical problem of adding vectors of normal and shear strains. Typically, the problem of defining an equivalent strain is solved by weighting factors. Unfortunately, this ignores the fact that these vectors represent other physical quantities: the normal strain is a longitudinal strain, and the shear strain is a rotation angle. Therefore, the goal of the present work was to propose a method of combining different types of strains by adopting a system of complex numbers. The normal strain was defined as the real part and the shear strain was defined as the imaginary part. Using this approach, simple load states, such as pure bending and pure torsion, have been transformed into an expression for equivalent strain identical to the previously proposed criteria defined by Macha.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7961447PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14051227DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

complex numbers
8
equivalent strain
8
normal strain
8
shear strain
8
strain defined
8
strain
7
formulation strain
4
strain fatigue
4
fatigue criterion
4
criterion based
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!