Erector Spinae Plane Block for Perioperative Analgesia after Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Int J Environ Res Public Health

Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

Published: March 2021

Erector spinae plane block was recently introduced as an alternative to postoperative analgesia in surgical procedures including thoracoscopies and mastectomies. There are no clinical trials regarding erector spinae plane block in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The aim of our study was to test the efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. We analyzed 68 patients, 34 of whom received erector spinae plane block. The average visual analogue scale score 24 h postoperatively was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were nalbuphine consumption and the need for rescue analgesia. Safety measures included the mean arterial pressure, Ramsey scale score, and rate of nausea and vomiting. The visual analogue scale, blood pressure, and Ramsey scale were assessed simultaneously at 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively. The average visual analogue scale was 2.9 and 3 ( = 0.65) in groups 1 (experimental) and 2 (control), respectively. The visual analogue scale after 1 h postoperatively was significantly lower in the erector spinae plane block group (2.3 vs. 3.3; = 0.01). The average nalbuphine consumption was the same in both groups (46 mL vs. 47.2 mL, = 0.69). The need for rescue analgesia was insignificantly different in both groups (group 1, 29.4; group 2, 26.4%; = 1). The mean arterial pressure was similar in both groups postoperatively (91.8 vs. 92.5 mmHg; = 0.63). The rate of nausea and vomiting was insignificantly different between the groups (group 1, 17.6%; group 2, 14.7%; = 1). The median Ramsey scale in all the measurements was two. Erector spinae plane block is an effective pain treatment after percutaneous nephrolithotomy but only for a very short postoperative period.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8036507PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18073625DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

erector spinae
28
spinae plane
28
plane block
28
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
16
visual analogue
16
analogue scale
16
ramsey scale
12
block percutaneous
8
average visual
8
scale score
8

Similar Publications

Modified Erector Spinae Block.

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol

January 2025

Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Interventional Radiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Tte. Gral. Juan Domingo Perón 4190, CABA, CP C1199ABB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Gastrointestinal symptoms of acute opioid withdrawal are distressing for patients and are often difficult to manage with conventional therapies. Insufficiently managed opioid withdrawal symptoms may lead patients to leave against medical advice, which can increase their risk of relapse and result in poor outcomes from untreated conditions. We assessed the impact of an erector spinae plane block on the acute gastrointestinal symptoms of opioid withdrawal.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Advances in Anesthesia Techniques for Postoperative Pain Management in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: An Expert Opinion.

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

January 2025

Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. Electronic address:

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) often leads to severe postoperative pain. At present, multimodal analgesia schemes for MICS have attracted much attention, and the application of various chest wall analgesia techniques is becoming increasingly widespread. However, research on anesthesia techniques for postoperative pain management in MICS remains relatively limited at present.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of two regional anesthesia methods, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block, for intraoperative and postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Methods: Fifty patients aged 18-80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II scheduled for elective laparoscopic nephrectomy were included after ethical approval and informed consent. Patients were randomly assigned to either Group TAP (receiving TAP block) or Group ESP (receiving ESP block).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!