Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) can induce lordosis and improve cervical sagittal vertical axis (SVA), but multilevel ACDF may inadvertently increase cervical SVA because of insufficient lordosis induction.
Methods: Patients who underwent 1-, 2-, or ≥3-level ACDF in the subaxial spine with minimum 2-year follow up were retrospectively studied. C2-C7 Cobb angle (lordosis), cervical SVA, and T1 slope were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at last follow-up.
Results: Inclusion criteria were met by 127 patients. There were no differences in baseline demographics among 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF groups. Mean follow-up was 43.7 months (range, 24-142 months). Increase of cervical SVA immediately postoperatively was 1.94 mm, -1.44 mm, and 7.25 mm for 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF (P = 0.041) and at last follow-up was 2.97 mm, 0.70 mm, and 9.32 mm for 1-, 2-, and ≥3-level ACDF (P = 0.026). At last follow-up, 2-level ACDF patients had the greatest decrease in T1 slope (-0.43°) compared with increase of 2.71° for 1-level and 2.84° for ≥3-level patients (P = 0.028). In all 3 groups, segmental (ACDF levels) lordosis, cervical SVA, and T1 slope did not decrease from immediate postoperative to last follow-up. Only 2-level ACDF maintained C2-7 lordosis (2.16°) compared with loss of lordosis in 1-level (-0.84°) and ≥3-level (-2.00°) ACDF (P = 0.008) at last follow-up. Linear regression analysis showed that T1 slope had no relationship with correction of cervical SVA (P = 0.5310) but had a significant correlation with Cobb angle loss of C2-C7 lordosis (P = 0.0016).
Conclusions: Compared with 1- and 2-level ACDF, ≥3-level ACDF resulted in significant increase of cervical SVA and loss of overall lordosis. Compared with 1- and ≥3-level ACDF, 2-level ACDF had the greatest ability to maintain lordosis. T1 slope had a significant correlation with loss of C2-C7 lordosis after ACDF.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.03.117 | DOI Listing |
Acta Neurochir (Wien)
January 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, 20 Boramae-Ro 5-Gil, Dongjak-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background: The degenerative spondylosis can cause the difficulty in maintaining sagittal and coronal alignment of spine, and X-ray parameters are the gold standard to analyze the malalignment. This study aimed to develop a new 3D full body scanner to analyze the spinal balance and compare it to X-ray parameters.
Methods: Ninety-seven adult participants who suffer degenerative spondylosis underwent 3D full body scanning, whole spine X-rays, clinical questionnaires and body composition analyses.
J Orthop Surg Res
January 2025
Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350004, China.
Objectives: To analyze the risk factors for developing dysphagia after occipitocervical fusion (OCF) and investigate possible mechanisms and prognosis.
Methods: The case data of 43 patients who underwent OCF were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into group A (dysphagia group) and group B (non-dysphagia group) based on Bazaz scoring criteria.
N Am Spine Soc J
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Background: Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are common treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy. While both procedures show similar clinical improvement, LF requires bony fusion while LP offers motion preservation. Cervical sagittal alignment and horizontal gaze maintenance are key outcome measures, but their comparative effects between LF and LP remain unclear.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSci Rep
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, GongTiNanLu 8#, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China.
We aimed to analyze the cervical sagittal alignment change following the growing rod treatment in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) and identify the risk factors of sagittal cervical imbalance after growing-rod surgery of machine learning. EOS patients from our centre between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographic parameters include the cervical lordosis (CL), T1 slope, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2-7 SVA), primary curve Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (C7-S1 SVA) and proximal junctional angle (PJA) were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final follow-up.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Spine Surg
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!