AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the clinical characteristics and nutritional practices of critically ill COVID-19 patients in Hubei, China, amidst the ongoing epidemic.
  • A total of 44 patients were analyzed, with 52.2% on mechanical ventilation and a median nutrition risk score of 3 indicating varying nutritional needs.
  • Enteral nutrition (EN) was the most common form of nutrition provided, yet only about 69.7% of patients met their energy target, highlighting potential areas for improvement in care.

Article Abstract

Background And Objectives: The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic is spreading all over the world. With the number of cases increasing rapidly, the epidemiological data on the nutritional practice is scarce. In this study, we aim to describe the clinical characteristics and nutritional practice in a cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients.

Methods And Study Design: This is a multicenter, ambidirectional cohort study conducted at 11 hospitals in Hubei Province, China. All eligible critical COVID-19 patients in the study hospital intensive care units at 00:00, March 6th, 2020, were included. Data collection was performed via written case report forms.

Results: A total of 44 patients were identified and enrolled, of whom eight died during the 28-day outcome follow- up period. The median interval between hospital admission and the study day was 24 (interquartile range, 13- 26) days and 52.2% (23 of 44) of patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation. The median nutrition risk in critically ill (mNUTRIC) score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-5) on the study day. During the enrolment day, 68.2% (30 of 44) of patients received enteral nutrition (EN), while 6.8% (3 of 44) received parenteral nutrition (PN) alone. Nausea and aspiration were uncommon, with a prevalence of 11.4% (5 of 44) and 6.8% (3 of 44), respectively. As for energy delivery, 69.7% (23 of 33) of patients receiving EN and/or PN were achieving their prescribed targets.

Conclusions: The study showed that EN was frequently applied in critical COVID-19 patients. Energy delivery may be suboptimal in this study requiring more attention.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6133/apjcn.202103_30(1).0003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nutritional practice
12
critically ill
12
covid-19 patients
12
study
9
ill covid-19
8
multicenter ambidirectional
8
ambidirectional cohort
8
cohort study
8
critical covid-19
8
study day
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!