Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The article compares the dynamic performances of the pump-controlled, valve-controlled and prime-mover controlled hydromotor drive systems for a wide range of operating conditions. The control strategy adopted for each of them varies the supply flow to the hydromotor that gives the regulated drive speed. In this respect, the Simscape models are developed for the said systems that are validated experimentally. On the basis of response time, overshoot, and steady-state error obtained from the simulation and test results, it is found that the valve controlled hydromotor drive system is more sensitive than the others; whereas, the load-sensing pump control requires more time to settle but has less overshoot.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.03.020 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!