Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Bottom-up proteomics provides often small amounts of highly complex samples that cannot be analysed by direct mass spectrometry (MS). To gain a better insight in the sample composition, liquid chromatography (LC) and (comprehensive) two-dimensional liquid chromatography (2D-LC or LC × LC) can be coupled to the MS. Low-flow separations are attractive for HRMS analysis, but they tend to be lengthy. In this work, a low-flow, online, actively modulated LC × LC system, based on hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) in the first dimension and reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) in the second dimension, was developed to separate complex mixtures of peptides. Miniaturization permitted the analysis of small sample amounts (1-5 μg) and direct coupling with micro-ESI MS (1 μL min). All components were focused and automatically transferred from HILIC to RPLC using stationary-phase-assisted active modulation (C18 traps) to deal with solvent-incompatibility or dilution issues. Optimization of the setup was performed for the HILIC columns and the RPLC columns to provide a more efficient separation and higher identification rates than obtained using one-dimensional (1D) LC. A 60% increase in peak capacity was obtained with the 2D setup compared to a 1D-RPLC separation and a 17-34% increase in the number of proteins identified was achieved for the samples analysed (2D-yeast-8280 peptides and 2D-kidney tissue-8843 peptides), without increasing the analysis time (2 h).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338349 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!