Diagnostic Performance of On-Site Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Patient-specific Lumped Parameter Models.

Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging

Departments of Radiology (R.W.v.H., P.A.d.J., M.J.W., T.L.) and Cardiology (M.V.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508GA Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif (M.J.W.); and Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands (I.I.).

Published: October 2019

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of a prototype on-site coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT FFR) algorithm, based on patient-specific lumped parameter models, for the detection of functionally significant stenosis defined by invasive FFR, and to compare the performance to anatomic evaluation of stenosis degree.

Materials And Methods: In this retrospective feasibility study, 77 vessels in 57 patients (42 of 57 [74%]) men; mean age, 58.5 years ± 9.2 [standard deviation]) who underwent clinically indicated coronary CT angiography within 60 days prior to an invasive FFR measurement were analyzed. Invasive FFR less than or equal to 0.80 was used to indicate a functionally significant stenosis. Diagnostic performance of CT FFR was evaluated and compared with evaluation of stenosis degree. Analysis was performed on a per-vessel basis.

Results: Invasive FFR revealed functionally significant stenoses in 37 vessels (48%). CT FFR showed a significantly increased ability to indicate functionally significant stenosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.87) compared with degree of stenosis at coronary CT angiography (AUC, 0.70; ΔAUC 0.17; < .01). Using a cutoff of less than or equal to 0.80 for CT FFR and greater than or equal to 50% degree of stenosis at coronary CT angiography to indicate a significant stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 33 of 37 (89.2%), 31 of 40 (77.5%), 33 of 42 (78.6%), 31 of 35 (88.6%), and 64 of 77 (83.1%), respectively, for CT FFR, and 33 of 37 (89.2%), 17 of 40 (42.5%), 33 of 56 (58.9%), 17 of 21 (81.0%), and 50 of 77 (64.9%), respectively, for degree of stenosis at coronary CT angiography.

Conclusion: Diagnostic performance of on-site CT FFR was superior to stenosis evaluation at coronary CT angiography for identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis in patients suspected of having or known to have coronary artery disease.© RSNA, 2019See also commentary by Schoepf et al.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977806PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/ryct.2019190036DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic performance
16
invasive ffr
16
coronary angiography
16
functionally stenosis
12
degree stenosis
12
stenosis coronary
12
stenosis
11
ffr
10
coronary
9
performance on-site
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!