The COVID-19 pandemic raised major concerns relating to hospital capacity and cross-infection patients and staff in the Emergency Department (ED) of a metropolitan hospital servicing a population of ~500,000. We determined to reduce length of stay and admissions in patients presenting with symptoms of possible myocardial infarction; the most common presentation group. After establishing stakeholder consensus, the existing accelerated diagnostic pathway (ADP) based on the ED Assessment of Chest-pain Score (EDACS), electrocardiogram, and troponin measurements with a high-sensitivity assay (hs-cTn) on presentation and two hours later (EDACS-ADP) was modified to stream patients following an initial troponin measure as follows: (i) to a very-low risk group who could be discharged home without follow-up or further testing, and (ii) to a low-risk group who could be discharged with next-day follow-up community troponin testing. Simulations were run in an extensive research database to determine appropriate hs-cTnI and EDACS thresholds for risk classification. This COVID-ADP was developed in ~2-weeks and was implemented in the ED within a further 3-weeks. A comparison of all chest pain presentations for the 3 months prior to implementation of the COVID-ADP to 3 months following implementation showed that there was a 64.7% increase in patients having only one troponin test in the ED, a 30-minute reduction of mean length of stay of people discharged home from the ED, and a 24.3% reduction in hospital admissions of patients ultimately diagnosed with non-cardiac chest pain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7941060 | PMC |
Intern Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, JPS Health Network, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA.
The accuracy of using HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, and troponin) scores with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) to risk stratify emergency department (ED) chest pain patients remains uncertain. We aim to compare the performance accuracy of determining major adverse cardiac event (MACE) among three modified HEART (mHEART) scores with the use of hs-cTn to risk stratify ED chest pain patients. This retrospective single-center observational study included ED patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome who had HEAR scores calculated and at least one hs-cTnI result.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJA Clin Rep
December 2024
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Relief Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Background: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare but potentially life-threatening complication. Under general anesthesia, neurological signs are often masked, delaying diagnosis and increasing the risk of sudden cardiovascular collapse. Therefore, early detection methods are critically needed.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBMC Cardiovasc Disord
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Background: Delayed lead perforation is a rare complication of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). Clinical presentations range from completely asymptomatic to pericardial tamponade. Surgical lead extraction is recommended and transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with surgical backup is an alternative method.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntensive Care Med Exp
December 2024
Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Background: Identifying spontaneous circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is challenging. Current methods, which involve intermittent and time-consuming pulse checks, necessitate pauses in chest compressions. This issue is problematic in both in-hospital cardiac arrest and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest situations, where resources for identifying circulation during CPR may be limited.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
November 2024
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address:
Introduction: There is growing interest in understanding chest sensory function due to the significant morbidity associated with impaired sensation following nerve injury. While the baseline quantitative sensory and pain thresholds in female and male patients have been studied in various other anatomic areas, there is little knowledge on quantitative sensation at the chest as well as the presence of possible gender differences. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comprehensive quantitative sensory analysis to determine if female and male chests feel the same.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!