Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: Using voice to speak or to sing is made possible by remarkably complex sensorimotor processes. Like any other sensorimotor system, the speech motor controller guides its actions with maximum performance at minimum cost, using available sources of information, among which, auditory feedback plays a major role. Manipulation of this feedback forces the speech monitoring system to refine its expectations for further actions. The present study hypothesizes that the duration of this refinement and the weight applied on different feedbacks loops would depend on the intended sounds to be produced, namely reading aloud versus singing.
Material And Methods: We asked participants to sing "Happy Birthday" and read a paragraph of Harry Potter before and after experiencing pitch-shifted feedback. A detailed fundamental frequency (F0) analysis was conducted for each note in the song and each segment in the paragraph (at the level of a sentence, a word, or a vowel) to determine whether some aspects of F0 production changed in response to the pitch perturbations experienced during the adaptation paradigm.
Results: Our results showed that changes in the degree of F0-drift across the song or the paragraph was the metric that was the most consistent with a carry-over effect of adaptation, and in this regard, reading new material was more influenced by recent remapping than singing.
Conclusion: The motor commands used by (normally-hearing) speakers are malleable via altered-feedback paradigms, perhaps more so when reading aloud than when singing. But these effects are not revealed through simple indicators such as an overall change in mean F0 or F0 range, but rather through subtle metrics, such as a drift of the voice pitch across the recordings.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.016 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!