Objectives: Spitting is an occupational hazard of police work with increased risk due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to calculate the prevalence of spitting on police officers in use of force incidents, as well as the demographic and situational factors associated with spitting.

Methods: Data on spitting were compiled from more than 10,000 use of force incidents occurring at 81 agencies in eight different states in the US.

Results: Spitting occurred in 3.6% of cases. Female and younger subjects and those using drugs and/or alcohol are more likely to spit on officers. Spitting is more likely to occur in incidents of longer duration, when officers use less force relative to subject resistance, when subjects are assaultive or engage in self-harm, and when subjects are hobbled.

Conclusions: Spitting on officers is common and may now constitute a significant work hazard. Implications for police practice are discussed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9758598PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110747DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spitting police
8
police officers
8
officers force
8
force incidents
8
spitting
7
officers
5
prevalence correlates
4
correlates spitting
4
police
4
officers risks
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!