Objective: Few studies have evaluated the total energy expenditure (TEE) of children with disabilities using the doubly labeled water (DLW) method; however, none have compared it by disability type. Furthermore, no large-scale studies have focused on the severity of motor disability (MD). We aimed to compare TEE in children with disabilities by disability type.

Methods: In a cross-sectional study design, TEE was measured using the DLW method, anthropometry, and weighted food records. The following comparisons were made: (1) TEEs among four disability types and (2) TEEs of three subgroups classified by MD based on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS).

Results: In total, 256 children (138 boys; ages 6-15 years) were studied. The comparison between the four disability types for boys in all age categories revealed that TEE (kJ/d) was lowest in MD, followed by intellectual disability (ID), visual disability, and hearing disability (HD), in that order. TEE/fat-free mass (FFM) (kJ/FFMkg/d) was also lowest in MD and highest in HD. TEE (kJ/d) and TEE/FFM (kJ/FFMkg/d) were also lowest in MD and highest in HD in girls. For both boys and girls, TEE (kJ/d) and TEE/FFM (kJ/FFMkg/d) were higher in the MD subtype GMFCS I-II than in GMFCS III-IV and GMFCS V.

Conclusions: TEE differed, depending on the disability type, and was the lowest in MD and highest in HD for both boys and girls. Analysis by GMFCS classification revealed that greater severity of motor dysfunction resulted in lower TEE.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41430-021-00885-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tee kj/d
12
lowest highest
12
disability
9
total energy
8
energy expenditure
8
disabilities doubly
8
doubly labeled
8
labeled water
8
tee
8
tee children
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!