Renogram image characteristics and the reproducibility of differential renal function measurement.

Purpose: Patient factors such as age and glomerular filtration rate (GFR), have been implicated as causes for poor reproducibility of differential renal function (DRF) estimates on 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine (99mTc-MAG3) renography. This study aims to investigate factors associated with the reproducibility of DRF measurements.

Methods: The association between age, GFR and imaged derived image characteristics and reproducibility of repeated DRF estimates calculated using the area under the curve method and the Rutland Patlak method was analysed for cohort 1 (n = 127). The association between these variables and reproducibility of DRF was tested with univariate linear regression. The univariate linear regression results were used to plan the multiple linear regression combinations.The associations between variables identified and reproducibility of DRF values were then tested in a second cohort (n = 227).

Results: The R2 values for goodness-to-fit for the multiple regression models ranged from 0.33 to 0.49 for cohort 1 and from 0.17 to 0.22 for cohort 2. Left kidney to background ratio (LKTBR) was significant in all the multiple linear regression combinations (P < 0.05). Right kidney to background ratio (RKTBR), right renal margins well defined, right renal margins poorly visualised, time visualisation right calyces and age were significant in most combinations. The reproducibility of DRF measurement was decreased when the kidney to background ratio (KTBR) was ≤2.

Conclusion: Only LKTBR, RKTBR, right renal margins well defined, time visualisation right calyces and age predicted reproducibility for the measurement of DRF on 99mTc-MAG3 renograms. The KTBR should be incorporated into the renal processing software as a quality control step. The DRF values should be interpreted with caution if the KTBR is ≤2.0.