Background: Inequalities in health care use between immigrants and non-migrants are an important issue in many countries, with potentially negative effects on population health and welfare. The aim of this study is to understand the factors that explain these inequalities in Switzerland, a country with one of the highest percentages of foreign-born population.
Methods: Using health survey data, we compare non-migrants to four immigrant groups, differentiating between first- and second-generation immigrants, and culturally different and similar immigrants. To retrieve the relative contribution of each inequality-associated factor, we apply a non-linear decomposition method and categorize the factors into demographic, socio-economic, health insurance and health status factors.
Results: We find that non-migrants are more likely to visit a doctor compared to first-generation and culturally different immigrants and are less likely to visit the emergency department. Inequalities in doctor visits are mainly attributed to the explained component, namely to socio-economic factors (such as occupation and income), while inequalities in emergency visits are mainly attributed to the unexplained component. We also find that despite the universal health care coverage in Switzerland systemic barriers might exist.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that immigrant-specific policies should be developed in order to improve access to care and efficiently manage patients in the health system.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7977586 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10393-9 | DOI Listing |
Am J Mens Health
January 2025
MiOra-Public Health Non-profit Organization, Encino, CA, USA.
The literature on health care disparities among U.S. minority men remains limited, and post-pandemic changes in the health care delivery system may uniquely affect this population.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Med
December 2025
Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Background: The current negative trend in the physical behavior and lifestyle of the population therefore requires adequate changes in the professional training of physiotherapists.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine the structure and differences in the weekly physical activity (PA) of Czech physiotherapy students, the use of wearables in physiotherapy professional training, and the attitude of physiotherapy students toward PA and the use of wearables in physiotherapy practice.
Methods: Between 2013 and 2022, 412 physiotherapy students participated in a PA-monitoring study using questonnaires International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form, Motives for Physical Activity Measure-Revise, pedometers, Garmin Vívofit and Axivity AX3 accelerometers.
J Adv Nurs
January 2025
Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia.
Aim: To develop a nurse-initiated protocol for early ward-based interprofessional coordination and formulation of person-centred care plans to assist in point-of-care management of behaviour in older patients on general hospital wards.
Design: A modified e-Delphi method was employed to establish expert consensus.
Method: Multidisciplinary acute-care experts experienced in hospital care of patients with dementia and/or delirium in Australia were recruited by email from 35 professional networks.
Haematologica
January 2025
Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Department and the Eisenberg RD Authority, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University Jerusalem, Jerusalem; Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa; The Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa.
Stroke
January 2025
Department of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, the Netherlands. (Y.B.W.E.M.R.).
Noninferiority trials aim to prove that the efficacy, defined in terms of a key clinical outcome, of a new treatment is not meaningfully worse than that of an established active control. Noninferiority trials are important when other aspects of care can be improved, such as convenience, toxicity, costs, and safety (nonefficacy benefits). While the motivation for a noninferiority trial is straightforward, the design, execution, and interpretation of these trials is not a trivial task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!