Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
For the past 30 years, the number of people infected with causative agents of ehrlichiosis, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and spotted fever group rickettiosis (SFGR) has increased in Oklahoma. However, there is a lack of data on pathogen prevalence within urban environments. To assess the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in different environments, 434 (lone star) ticks were collected from the environment in two parks in Edmond, Oklahoma. The presence of spp. and spotted fever group (SFG) spp. was determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). 33.6% (146/434) of the ticks were positive for and 15.2% (66/434) were positive for . No ticks were positive for other SFG Rickettsiae () or other Ehrlichiae ( and Panola Mountain ). These studies provide increased understanding of the potential risk for encountering tick-borne pathogens in urban environments.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8086404 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2020.2755 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!