Comparative Analysis of Immunohistochemical Staining Intensity Determined by Light Microscopy, ImageJ and QuPath in Placental Hofbauer Cells.

Acta Histochem Cytochem

Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.

Published: February 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Software-based analyses aim to provide quantitative and objective data for immunohistochemical staining, but often require a focus on specific cells or structures, like Hofbauer cells in placental samples.
  • Two independent observers assessed staining intensities of Hofbauer cells using ImageJ, QuPath, and light microscopy, needing precise manual ROI determination.
  • The study found low inter-observer variability, with almost perfect agreement between ImageJ and QuPath, and moderate agreement with light microscopy; however, software analyses are more time-consuming, raising questions about their efficiency for selected ROIs.

Article Abstract

Software based analyses of immunohistochemical staining are designed for obtaining quantitative, reproducible, and objective data. However, often times only a certain type of positive cells or structures need to be quantified thus whole image analysis cannot be performed. Such an example is Hofbauer placental cells, which show positivity of some antigens together with trophoblast, but only Hofbauer cells represent the regions of interest (ROIs). Two independent observers evaluated the immunohistochemical staining intensity of Hofbauer cells in placenta samples stained for cytoplasmic antigens by ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy. Thus, the precise manual determination of ROIs, i.e. Hofbauer cells, was necessary. We detected low inter-observer variability in staining intensity. Almost perfect agreement between observers was reached for ImageJ and QuPath whilst substantial agreement was reached for light microscopy evaluation. As for the comparison of ImageJ, QuPath and light microscopy, the agreement of all three methods (identical immunohistochemical intensity) was achieved for 38.1% samples. The almost perfect agreement of staining intensities was reached between ImageJ and QuPath, and moderate agreement for comparison of the light microscopy to both software. Software analyses are much more time-consuming, thus their utilization is at least questionable to evaluate ROIs with selection.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7947637PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1267/ahc.20-00032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

light microscopy
20
imagej qupath
20
hofbauer cells
16
immunohistochemical staining
12
staining intensity
12
qupath light
8
perfect agreement
8
reached imagej
8
cells
6
staining
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!