Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
An experimental dataset, WCG, was assembled. The set includes 416 pairs of samples that surround 28 colour centres and covers a wide colour gamut. The data were used to test the performance of seven colour-difference models, CIELAB, CIEDE2000, CAM16-UCS, DIN99d, OSAGP, and ICTCP, Jzazbz. Colour discrimination ellipses were also fitted to compare the uniformity of the colour spaces. Different versions of the models were derived to improve the fit to the data, including parametric factors, kL, kC, and a power factor. It was found that the kL optimised CAM16-UCS, DIN99d, OSAGP models significantly outperformed the other colour models. In addition, the magnitude of the colour difference had an impact on visual assessment.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.413985 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!