Self-regulation differences across learner and probationary drivers: The impact on risky driving behaviours.

Accid Anal Prev

Adolescent Risk Research Unit (ARRU), Sunshine Coast Mind and Neuroscience - Thompson Institute, University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Australia; Consortium of Adolescent Road Safety (cadrosa.org). Electronic address:

Published: May 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Risky driving behaviors contribute significantly to road accidents among young drivers, and this study investigates the role of self-regulation in these behaviors using self-determination theory.
  • The study surveyed 1,038 Learner drivers and 589 P1 drivers (ages 16-19) to compare their self-regulated safety orientation and risky driving behaviors, finding that self-determination theory effectively predicts such behaviors for both groups.
  • While Learner and P1 drivers exhibited similar levels of risky driving, Learners felt more pressure and tension, indicating that their self-regulatory processes might be less developed, suggesting a need for enhanced training and supervision to improve safe driving habits.

Article Abstract

Risky driving behaviours are a known contributor to young drivers' overrepresentation in road trauma, with self-regulation suggested as an important associated construct, but yet to be extensively explored. The aims of this study were to examine the utility of self-determination theory in explaining risky driving behaviours and to explore differences between young Learner and Provisional (P1)- licensed drivers in regard to their self-regulated safety orientation and engagement in risky driving behaviours. Learners (n = 1038) and P1(n = 589) drivers, aged 16-19 years, responded to a 91-item online survey, including self-regulated safety orientation items adapted from self-determination theory and inattentive and intentional risky driving behaviour items. Results showed that self-determination theory had good predictive power for the two types of risky driving behaviours for both licence groups. Learner and P1 drivers' engagement in risky behaviours was similar, however, the relative importance of self-regulated safety orientation elements to reduced engagement in these behaviours differed. Learners' engagement in intentional risky behaviours reflected greater perceived effort/importance and pressure/tension compared to P1 drivers. Greater effort/importance is an overarching indicator of internalised regulation concerning safe driving behaviours, which might be primed when first exposed to driving. However, greater perceived pressure/tension suggests that internalisation of self-regulatory processes is being suppressed during the Learner phase. This might stem from the required presence of driver trainers and supervisory drivers, as well as interactions with other road users. Whilst only tentative explanations in this first exploration, the findings suggest there is potential for greater efforts in Learner driver training and supervision to encompass the types of skills and learning that encourage the development of self-regulation to reduce risky driving behaviours during both the Learner and P1 stage. These findings contribute to the limited research regarding self-regulation by young novice drivers and informs a better understanding of the psychological influences of engagement in risky driving behaviours, including the first such examination among early independent licensed drivers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risky driving
32
driving behaviours
32
self-determination theory
12
self-regulated safety
12
safety orientation
12
engagement risky
12
behaviours
11
risky
10
driving
10
licensed drivers
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!