Military Participation in Health Security: Analysis of Joint External Evaluation Reports and National Action Plans for Health Security.

Health Secur

Brett M. Forshey, PhD, is a US Public Health Service Officer and an Epidemiologist and Alexandra Woodward, MPH, is a Senior Biosurveillance Specialist, Global Emerging Infections Surveillance; and Jose L. Sanchez, MD, is Deputy Chief; all with the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, Silver Spring, MD. Alexandra Woodward is also a Senior Biosurveillance Specialist, Cherokee Nation Strategic Programs, Tulsa, OK; and a DrPH Health Security Student, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD. Stephanie R. Petzing, PhD, is Senior Global Health Security Advisor, Henry M. Jackson Foundation, Center for Global Health Engagement, Bethesda, MD. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Department of Defense or of the US government.

Published: September 2021

Militaries around the world play an important but at times poorly defined and underappreciated role in global health security. They are often called upon to support civilian authorities in humanitarian crises and to provide routine healthcare for civilians. Military personnel are a unique population in a health security context, as they are highly mobile and often deploy to austere settings domestically and internationally, which may increase exposure to endemic and emerging infectious diseases. Despite the role of militaries, few studies have systematically evaluated their involvement in global health security activities including the Global Health Security Agenda. We analyzed Joint External Evaluation (JEE) mission reports (n = 94) and National Action Plan for Health Security plans (n = 12), published as of July 2020, to determine the extent to which military organizations were involved in the evaluation process, military involvement in health security activities were described, and specific recommendations were provided for the country's military. For JEE reports, descriptions of military involvement were highest in 3 of the 4 core areas: Respond (76%), Prevent (39%), and Detect (32%). Similarly, National Action Plan for Health Security plans mentioned military involvement in the same 3 core areas: Respond (58%), Prevent (33%), and Detect (33%). Only 28% of JEE reports provided recommendations for the military in any of the core areas. Our results indicate that military roles and contributions are incorporated into some aspects of country-level health security activities, but that more extensive involvement may be warranted to improve national capabilities to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/hs.2020.0030DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health security
40
national action
12
global health
12
security activities
12
military involvement
12
core areas
12
health
10
security
10
military
9
joint external
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!