AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates the effectiveness and safety of mechanical thrombectomy in children who have suffered a stroke, aiming to address concerns about inconsistent reporting in existing literature.
  • It compares clinical data from 42 children treated at specific study sites with 133 cases documented in published reports, focusing on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores before and after treatment.
  • Findings reveal that study site patients had more complete reporting of stroke severity, but they also experienced worse short-term outcomes compared to those reported in literature cases.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Because children often have lifelong morbidity after stroke, there is considerable enthusiasm to pursue mechanical thrombectomy in childhood stroke based on literature reports. However, current published data may reflect inconsistent reporting and publication bias, which limit the ability to assess safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in childhood stroke.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study compared reporting quality and clinical outcomes for mechanical thrombectomy between a trial-derived cohort of 42 children treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute stroke at study sites and 133 patients reported in the literature. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at baseline, 24 hours after mechanical thrombectomy, and at discharge were compared between study site patients and literature patients. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare reporting frequencies. Proportional odds logistic regression was used to compare outcomes.

Results: Premechanical thrombectomy National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was available in 93% of study patients compared with 74% of patients in the literature (OR, 4.42 [95% CI, 1.47-19.89]). Postmechanical thrombectomy National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was available in 69% of study patients compared with 29% of literature cases at 24 hours (OR, 5.48 [95% CI, 2.62-12.06]), and 64% of study patients compared with 32% of cases at discharge (OR, 3.85 [95% CI, 1.87-8.19]). For study sites, median scores were 12 at baseline, 9 at 24 hours, and 5 at discharge. Median scores in case reports were 15 at baseline, 4 at 24 hours, and 3 at discharge. ORs for differences in outcomes between groups were 5.97 (95% CI, 2.28-15.59) at 24 hours and 3.68 (95% CI, 1.45-9.34) at discharge.

Conclusions: Study site patients had higher rates of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale reporting and worse short-term outcomes compared with literature reports. Rigorous data collection is needed before treatment guidelines for pediatric mechanical thrombectomy can be developed.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mechanical thrombectomy
28
national institutes
16
institutes health
16
health stroke
16
stroke scale
16
baseline hours
12
study patients
12
patients compared
12
thrombectomy
9
data collection
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!